Attribution and partners in the same platform
Adjust is a strong mobile measurement partner. It is also only mobile measurement — so if you run affiliates, web conversions or an ecommerce program alongside your app, it is one of at least two platforms you are paying for.
AffClix vs. Adjust
Detailed head-to-head breakdowns covering strengths, weaknesses, pricing, and the bottom line verdict.
- App and web attribution in one report. A partner who drives both installs and web signups shows as one partner, not two rows in two systems.
- Partner payouts, tiers and portals included. An MMP measures; it does not run a partner program or pay anyone.
- Plan-based pricing rather than a rate that scales with attributed volume.
- Adjust postbacks are still supported. Keep it where it is embedded and forward those events into the same reporting.
- Ecommerce and product-feed attribution for brands whose app is one channel among several.
- Published pricing you can evaluate without a sales call.
- Deeper mobile-specific measurement, including mature fraud prevention built for install fraud at scale.
- A very wide network integration catalogue for mobile user acquisition.
- Established enterprise privacy and compliance tooling, which matters for regulated categories.
- Recognition with mobile networks, some of which will ask for an Adjust link by name.
Adding AffClix alongside Adjust: common questions
Can AffClix replace Adjust?
For a business where the app is one channel among affiliates, web and ecommerce, usually yes. For mobile-only user acquisition across many networks, a dedicated MMP is still the better-fitting tool.
Do you accept Adjust postbacks?
Yes. Keep Adjust where it is already embedded and forward those events to us, so app and web attribution still sit in one report.
What does combining them actually change?
Overlap becomes visible. When the same partner drives both installs and web signups, two separate systems show two separate partners and you cannot see that you are paying twice for one relationship.
Is fraud detection comparable?
For install fraud specifically, theirs is more specialised. Ours covers web and app traffic in one model, which matters more when your partners send both.
How do I evaluate without committing?
Start with the live demo — no signup. After that, run us in parallel with Adjust for a week on real traffic and compare the numbers before changing anything.
Move from Adjust in 48 hours — we do the work
Nobody stays on Adjust because it is the best tool. They stay because moving offers, affiliates, postbacks and history sounds like a fortnight of pain. It is not, and you do not have to do it yourself.
- 1A 30-minute audit callWe look at your current setup together and tell you honestly whether switching is worth it for you.
- 2We import everythingOffers, affiliates, payout terms and historical stats — moved by us, not by you.
- 3Postbacks and macros mappedWe rebuild your postback URLs and traffic-source macros and hand them back for approval.
- 4A week running both in parallelBoth platforms live at once, numbers compared side by side. You switch only when they match.
- 5Cutover and 30 days of supportTracking domain moves across, and a named person stays with you for the first month.
Stop Overpaying | Start Performing.
One subscription covers affiliate tracking, mobile attribution, ecommerce and fraud protection — with your data kept in your own workspace. Look at it before you decide: the demo runs on real data and needs no signup.
Compare AffClix with other platforms
See the best affiliate tracking software of 2026, all eight compared side by side →
- AffClix vs Trackdesk
- AffClix vs Trackier
- AffClix vs Everflow
- AffClix vs Affise
- AffClix vs Scaleo
- AffClix vs CAKE
- AffClix vs HasOffers (TUNE)
- AffClix vs Offer18
- AffClix vs impact.com
- AffClix vs Tapfiliate
- AffClix vs Refersion
- AffClix vs Post Affiliate Pro
- AffClix vs Voluum
- AffClix vs AppsFlyer
- AffClix vs Keitaro
- AffClix vs BeMob
- AffClix vs RedTrack
- AffClix vs Offerslook
- AffClix vs HugOffers
- AffClix vs Swaarm
- AffClix vs In-house tracking